• Subscribe

Algorithms are rewriting world history

Speed read
  • Plimpton 322 tablet mystery solved
  • Ratio-based trigonometric table revealed
  • Mathematicians credit computer literacy and algorithms for the find

A 3,700-year-old clay tablet fragment and a handful of algorithms has just upturned the history of intellectual progress.

Unearthed in the south of present day Iraq, a remnant of an ancient Babylonian clay tablet called Plimpton 322 is thrilling scholars again. The fragment is small, containing a four column, 15-row table of sexagesimal numbers written in cuneiform.

It has been interpreted in many ways, but an exciting reading out of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) posits the fragment as an ancient and simple form of trigonometry.

Sydney scientists have discovered the purpose of a famous 3,700-year old Babylonian clay tablet, revealing it as the world’s oldest and most accurate trigonometric table, likely used by ancient mathematical scribes to calculate how to construct palaces, temples, and stepped pyramids. Courtesy UNSW.

This bright new take is receiving a lot of international attention, not least for its upending of the known history of mathematics.

What has not been widely disseminated is how mathematician Daniel Mansfield arrived at his thrilling discovery.

Mansfield and his co-author, associate professor Norman Wildberger from UNSW Sydney, are first to argue that Plimpton 322 is a ratio-based trigonometric table. To understand why this is significant we must recall the basis for our Western (Grecian) mathematical heritage.

Our better angles

The tradition of trigonometry (triangle measuring) is bound up with our penchant for star-gazing. Ancient thinkers sought to determine angular motion based on the rotation of the earth and to predict the location of stellar bodies.

Following this tradition, we use an angle to determine the shape of a right triangle and understand the ratios of the sides as circular functions (sin, cos and tan).

<strong>The right way. </strong> Two conceptualizations of a right triangle, The Greek (left) and Babylonian (right). The Babylonians used ratios, not angles, to describe a right triangle. Courtesy Daniel Mansfield.

The Babylonians did not have the notion of circular function. Instead they used ratios such as the ukullû, (‘run over rise,’ or reciprocal slope), Mansfield notes. The same measurement features prominently in Egyptian mathematics.

By conceiving of right triangles as half of a rectangle and using a sexagesimal number system (like the minutes in an hour), Babylonians could arrive at precise triangle measurement.

The absence of angles means that Plimpton 322 is not useful for astronomical calculations. But it is surprisingly powerful when it comes to measuring right triangles, and even compares favorably to much later tables such as Madhava’s sine table from the 15th century AD.

“The breakthrough was, in part, made possible by a numerical library that I wrote to perform sexagesimal arithmetic. By actually doing the Babylonian procedures myself (with the computer to assist) I was able to see some of the subtleties that others had missed,” he says.

Mansfield used these algorithms to test the longstanding hypothesis that Plimpton 322 was a description of solutions to a certain type of quadratic problem.

It was not advances in hardware that enabled this discovery, it was advances in education that made this possible. ~ Daniel Mansfield

Performing the calculations for each row, he noticed that some of the operations were uncharacteristically complex, particularly those in row four, where the square root calculation turned out to be impossible to perform using Babylonian techniques.

This realization showed the prevailing hypothesis about Plimpton 322 was flawed, opening the door for a trigonometric interpretation.

Despite his facility with algorithms and the breakthroughon a puzzle that has stymied mathematicians for at least 70 years, Mansfield insists his predecessors could have seen what he has if only they had the computer literacy. 

“The numerical complexity of sexagesimal calculation makes it cumbersome to perform by hand,” Mansfield says. “But you need to make these calculations to thoroughly test a hypothesis, and modern computer literacy made this feasible. So, it was not advances in hardware that enabled this discovery, it was advances in education that made this possible.”

Daze of future past

Mansfield dubs the Babylonian approach to trigonometry BEST (Babylonian Exact Sexagesimal Trigonometry), but this is no hyperbole. He believes that this alternative view based on ratios can be taught alongside the traditional angle based approach, and thereby enrich the study of trigonometry in school by looking at triangles from different cultural perspectives.

Mansfield also sees great potential for this Babylonian approach in computing. The old Cray supercomputers once performed division using a Babylonian reciprocal table, and now we have a similar approach for trigonometry.

“A modern implementation of these ideas would not meet the IEEE 754 floating-point standard for accuracy, so this approach is not going to revolutionize floating-point arithmetic,” admits Mansfield, “but it would be efficient and very fast, so it may be useful for applications where energy consumption or speed are integral to success.”

<strong>Math problem.</strong> UNSW mathematician Daniel Mansfield examines Plimpton 322, the tablet fragment that contains evidence of trigonometry and Pythagorean triples a thousand years earlier than previously known. Courtesy UNSW.

Applications aside, the rewriting of intellectual history is no small feat. It should cause a major rethink of theories of progress and a reflection on knowledge lost to the ages.

3,700 years have come and gone, but this old clay fragment has a lot to teach us about something we thought we already knew.

“Perhaps the best we can hope for is to use history as a mirror to reveal parts of Western culture that are deeply embedded. Measuring triangles through the angle has been lodged within mathematics for a long time, and without the Babylonians we would probably never have had reason to think differently.”

More background about trigonometry from UNSW can be found here.

What to learn more? Take a deeper dive with professors Mansfield and Wildberger in this video explainer series.

Courtesy UNSW.
Courtesy UNSW.
Courtesy UNSW.
Courtesy UNSW.

Join the conversation

Do you have story ideas or something to contribute? Let us know!

Copyright © 2021 Science Node ™  |  Privacy Notice  |  Sitemap

Disclaimer: While Science Node ™ does its best to provide complete and up-to-date information, it does not warrant that the information is error-free and disclaims all liability with respect to results from the use of the information.


We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit ScienceNode.org — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on ScienceNode.org” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.